Historians are divided on whether Padmini actually existed.”This was an unprecedented and tough situation.Reacting to the development, founder-patron of Rajput Karni Sena Lokendra Singh Kalvi said a lot of clarifications are yet to come on the issues and it will be too early to comment.Considering the complexities and concerns around the film, the CBFC appointed a “special panel to add perspective to the final decision of the censor board&ODM inspection doors39;s official committee”.As protests spread across various states, the film’s December 1 release was deferred as it didn’t have censor clearance.
The film got stuck in controversy after various Rajput groups alleged that it distorts history, a claim repeatedly denied by the director.He said that this was not the first instance that a special panel was appointed for the certification process as a similar practice was followed while certifying ‘Jodhaa Akbar’ and ‘Aarkashan’.The special panel included Arvind Singh from Udaipur, Chandramani Singh and professor K K Singh of the Jaipur University.Besides Joshi, the meeting was also attended by regular examining committee members, along with other censor board officials.The board has also suggested modifications in disclaimers, pertinently adding one regarding not glorifying the practice of “Sati” and also # relevant changes in the song ‘Ghoomar’ to befit the character portrayed, he said.He, however, said his stand is “very clear, which is known to everyone”.
There were reports doing the rounds that the board had suggested 26 cuts to the film, but in a statement, Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) chairman Prasoon Joshi clarified that they have only advised five modifications, including the title change, but “no cuts”.The certificate as per the procedure will be issued once the required modifications are carried out and final material is submitted.. I am glad that following a balanced approach we resolved the task at hand in a pragmatic and positive manner,” Joshi said on CBFC’s decision to give the film a UA certificate.The film’s final 3D application was submitted on November 28, the CBFC said.Bhansali, who appeared before a parliamentary panel, had said his lavishly-mounted Rs 150 crore period drama, featuring Deepika Padukone, Shahid Kapoor and Ranveer Singh, is based on the 16th century epic poem Padmavat by Malik Muhammad Jayasi.
President of Rajput Sabha Giriraj Singh Lotwara said that it was unfortunate that the board wants to favour the film producers instead of considering recommendations of the panel that reviewed the film.Joshi said, the filmmakers, Bhansali Productions, in a written communication to CBFC, had also requested that a panel of historians/academicians and members of the Rajput community view the film.The board had a meeting of their examining committee on December 28 and decided to give the film a “UA certification along with some modifications and likely change of the film’s title on the basis the attributed material/creative source”. Mumbai: The censor board has decided to give Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s ‘Padmavati’ a UA certificate without any cuts but has suggested that the director change the film’s title to ‘Padmavat’ besides making four other modifications. Deepika Padukone in a still from ‘Padmavati’.Joshi added that the producers and the director of the film are “completely in agreement” with the proposed modifications.As protests spread across various states, the film’s December 1 release was deferred.He said that he will continue to protest against ‘Padmavati’ in democratic manner
asticcess