Imagen de avatar 3.8mm Robot Lawn Mower Wire
J&H Company

Both the cars in the comparison are seven-seaters

But, since the Skoda is wider, seating three might be a tad bit easier. Also, since the Skoda Stands closer to the ground (188mm as compared to Endeavour’s 225mm), it might be the better handling SUV of the two. But the Endeavour is longer in length, has a longer wheelbase and houses a smaller boot, all of which translates into more space in the cabin.The craze for SUVs is growing worldwide and now Skoda has decided to join the frenzy with its latest offering, the Kodiaq. Both the SUVs come loaded with safety features and gizmos to keep you pitched straight on the – and off-the road. But when it comes to the engines themselves, they could not be further apart. The Kodiaq is making headlines with its sleek design and stylish interiors. Will the Kodiaq be able to challenge the well-established player in the segment, the Endeavour Let’s have a look at the specification comparison of both the cars to have a better idea. So the likelihood of the engine making its way into the Kodiaq is quite high. While the terrain management system in the Endeavour is a part of the package, the off-road mode in the Kodiaq comes as an optional system for the all-wheel-drive versions, along with Driving Mode Select. While the Endeavour is meant to conquer mountains and drive through rivers, the Kodiaq is subtle and aims at a comfortable city and highway ride, while being off-road capable.2 and 3.com.0-litre turbocharged petrol motor in India since it is part of its global offerings. Once launched, it will take on the Ford Endeavour.FeaturesAgain, the contrast in the personalities of the two SUVs is evident here. Endeavour, on the other hand, has 450 litres in the boot, which can be China lawn mower blade pushed to 2,101 litres by folding the seats.

Both the cars in the comparison are seven-seaters and have adequate space to seat the said capacity. Speaking of boot space, Kodiaq has the largest in the segment (as claimed by Skoda) at 720 litres, which can be extended to 2,065 litres.Skoda might also launch the 2. The power outputs from the Kodiaq’s engines (150PS/190PS) are 10PS lower than the Ford SUV’s (160PS/200PS) and the torque outputs are considerably lower as well; but the Kodiaq is a lot lighter than the Endeavour and so might turn out to be the better performer. The reason we say this is that this very motor, which produces 180PS of power and 320Nm of torque in the SUV, might also power the upcoming Octavia vRS.With the increasing popularity of SUVs, automakers are trying to gain more market share by introducing new cars into the segment.So, what we see here is a contrast of personalities.Source: CarDekho. However, the Endeavour has a chunky steering wheel and a more commanding cockpit view than the Kodiaq with its elegant three-spoke wheel. Both of these SUVs have plush interiors and a touchscreen infotainment system with navigation, in an identical dashboard layout. While the Endeavour uses two different diesel engines (2.MechanicsTo be honest, both of these cars are quite similar when it comes to mechanical outputs.DimensionsSUVs are meant to be spacious.0-litre). Both the vehicles come loaded with features, but for different purposes.3-litre), Kodiaq has one diesel engine in two different tunes (2. The seven-seater SUV from the Czech car manufacturer will arrive in India next year. This will surely be confirmed as soon as we lay our hands on both of these SUVs for a head-to-head

Tags:

Deja un comentario