After all, for over two and half decades since 1993 — when elections were first held for the Government of the National Capital Region — this is the first instance of violent conflict. Put simply, ever since Independence in 1947, a “Lutyens’ political set” has evolved, which often seems to have more in common with each other than their own party brethren from out of town.Is this sorry state of governance an outlier? Unfortunately, no.Delhi is just a “half-state government” — to twist Chetan Bhagat’s evocative phrase. In this classic struggle, it is the establishment — the bureaucracy and the police — which bear the brunt of the ire of marginalised people. It festers in every municipality, where a different party controls the state government. This stops cities from becoming the fulcrum of participative democracy and vibrant growth centres. Alas, there are too many of the latter. He was made to sit on a sofa, sandwiched between two legislators, who subsequently assaulted him. A mild-mannered old-school bureaucrat, he has none of the Machiavellian skills needed to become a trusted adviser, simultaneously, to two implacable political adversaries. This strategy has worked for both of them. The CS avers the advertisements violate the Supreme Court guidelines for government advertisements. The AAP contends that holding up the advertisement, churlishly, is yet another instance of how the Central government uses the office of the lieutenant-governor (L-G) to shackle the state government. In 1999-2004 the tables were reversed with Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee of the BJP heading the National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre and chief minister Sheila Dikshit, of the Congress, at the state level. The Delhi government is in turmoil. When elephants fight, the bureaucratic grass is bound to get trampled. Are institutional arrangements for governance in Delhi so fraught that thed intemperate language in the shouting match between them. On February 19, AAP legislators heckled, abused and allegedly assaulted chief secretary Anshu Prakash, the Delhi government’s topmost bureaucrat, at the residence of the chief minister. The AAP would relish being dismissed by the President of India on the charge of a breakdown in the constitutional machinery. Compromise is akin to defeat. Further investigations would reveal the facts. His partymen emulate his casual dress style.
He found a group of 11 legislators and/or partymen — notably all male — assembled. Narasimha Rao ruled the Union government till 1996. The management of land, the police and the civil service remains with the Union government, represented by the L-G. Two legislators — the alleged assailants — have been arrested.However, this is hardly the first time that different parties have been in power.Since 2014, this “Lutyens’ consensus” lies shattered. wholesale bronzing sofa fabrics This safety valve is taken away when different parties are in power.More immediately, in Delhi, we need a truce. He draws power directly from the masses.Beyond the inter-personal behaviour issues, which may have sparked the conflict, a larger problem looms.V. In 1993-98 the BJP under Madan Lal Khurana ruled the state, while the Congress under Prime Minister P. The bone of contention, according to the CS, was that the legislators were outraged that TV advertisements on the completion of three years of the AAP government in Delhi were not approved in time. A dangerous trend, which could be a tipping point, in urban governance.. Both CM Arvind Kejriwal and deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia were present. Neither is likely to change.But the circumstantial evidence favours the chief secretary’s case. Cross-first information reports have been lodged by the two rival parties with the police. So why the open conflict this time?One difference is, that on the previous occasions, when power was split in Delhi between two parties, both were national parties with mature leaders, well versed and socialised in working within the constitutional constraints of the separation of powers.The state government-level staff and officer unions have demonstrated and resorted to work-to-rule tactics against the criminal assault on a government servant while on
fabriwst