It was an Anarchist who shot President McKinley on his inauguration day, because of McKinley’s invasion Cuba and other islands in the area. It does not make the enemy more sympathetic to the cause of these radicals., etc.” I cannot see justice, in a people laying down, to make it easier for their oppressors to steal their labor and destroy their culture., etc. Let’s take some examples.I think the essential message here is that revolution alone does convince people of the arguments of Anarchism, Socialism, Communism, etc., etc.), if we took all of those away, and a revolution were to take place because fo that, I think it’s pretty obvious what kind of government the revolutionaries would set up. It was the Anarchist Alexander Berkman who assasinated Frick, a Capitalist whose idea of “humaneness” was working in dangerous conditions for low and unfair pay.
That is to say, what they created upon the eve of revolution, was a system of government that the reformers had been aiming to create. The French Resistance to the Nazi invasion of France; did these underground revolutionaries (“terrorists”) help to better serve their purpose? Were they wrong for secretly building bombs to be used in destroying fortifications of the Third Reich? I don’t think of any person would disagree to this argument, excepting maybe Gandhi. They would create a government that wasn’t much different than the previous one, the primary differences being a fair minimum wage law, overtime pay, non-hazardous work conditions, etc. In fact, what use is revolutionary activity? Does it have any valuable, useful aspects to it? I suppose I am of the opinion, “No Peace Without Justice. . That does not mean that revolution itself is a completely useless tool, without any relation to the class struggles that take place everyday in modern society.. Consider American and European revolutionaries today, “urban guerillas,” etc.
That is to say, the arguments of those who want to radically reorganize society so that human misery and want nearly disappear completely.. If we took away the hard-earned rights that labor has earned in the United States (minimum wage, overtime pay, etc. At least, not necessarily.Consider a more modern argument. But then again, the way governments and corporations respond to such industrial sabotage and warfare, is usually with a repression of civil liberties. There is a good chance that the activities of bombing McDonald’s and burning down Starbucks will catch the public eye, and make it a social issue. Not only is such an idea devoid of justice, but it is equally devoid of sense and common reasoning.What was enacted was the Jacobin philosophy, that of a Federated Custom OEM Valve Parts Precision Investment Casting Republican government..
dwq