The Bench, while hearing a special leave petition relating to deaths caused by road accident expressed its anguish about the nonchalant attitude of the drivers who harbour the notion that they are the monarchs of all they survey. We appreciate the concern shown by Mr. Rohtagi and, we are sure, he will apprise the competent authorities to have a revisit of the relevant provisions. Elaborating further, it was contended by him that when a broken wall falls and someone gets injured or a person dies, Section 304-A is also attracted.”The Bench said “On a query being made whether Section 184 of MV Act is sufficient for adequate handling of the situation, the AG’s answer is an emphatic ‘No’. It is a matter of common knowledge that the drivers drive because of their profession but there are individuals who drive the vehicle because of their uncontrolled propensity for adventure. Nagappan asked Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi to impress upon the Union government to have a re-look at IPC Section 304-A (causing death due to negligence which provides for upto two years imprisonment) to ensure that higher punishment is awarded for such offences.
The bench also wanted the government to take a re-look at Section 184 of Motor Vehicles Act under which fine is imposed for dangerous driving including using mobile phone. He submitted that occurring of accidents is a dangerous and tragic phenomenon and it is required to be curbed with iron hands.The Bench in its order said “needless to say, there cannot be any dispute about the same but this Court is really concerned with the vehicular accidents that extinguish the life-spark of many because of the whim and fancy, adventurism and harbouring of the notion that they are “larger than life” of the men at the wheel.” The Bench directed the matter to be listed for further hearing on December 6. The court also expressed its agony about the number of vehicular accidents that take place in the country and how lakhs of people breathed their last or lost their limbs in such accidents because of the conduct of the drivers.On Wednesday the Attorney General submitted that IPC Section 304-A covers all kinds of deaths by negligence and, therefore, mere providing of higher punishment may not sub-serve the cause of justice. It can be stated with certitude that the number of vehicles in the country has increased in geometrical manner and the people are in a competition to pick up the speed. A Bench of Justices Dipaki Misr and C.
He said that some people drive China Low Speed Motor Wheels Motor Manufacturers while putting their mobile phones in the ears as a consequence of which disastrous consequences take place. They really do not care for the lives of others.. The Bench suggested that Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code requires to have a re-look because the punishment provided therein is absolutely inadequate in the context of the modern day. And the effect is the person gets into misery or he causes miseries to others but the offenders are let off with a fine under Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, he added.The Supreme Court asked the Centre on Wednesday to consider amending the Indian Penal Code and the Motor Vehicles Act to provide for enhanced punishment for road accidents and resultant deaths caused due to rash and negligent driving.
Tags: DC inverter paddle wheel aerator suppliers, drive brushless geared e-bike motors for sale, Electric Motor Manufacturers
ypelcebor